1957 Buick 40 vs. 2007 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1957 Buick 40. (248 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1957 Buick 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Buick 40 (515 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Cadillac STS. (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1957 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Buick 40 | 2007 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | STS |
Year Released | 1957 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 3556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 248 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2960 mm |