1957 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1957 Buick 40. (248 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1957 Buick 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Buick 40 (515 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden UTE. (340 Nm). This means 1957 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Buick 40 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | 40 | UTE |
Year Released | 1957 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 248 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 340 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |