1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 1968 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1968 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1968 Cadillac Brougham. (229 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1968 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 176 kg more than 1957 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Cadillac 62 | 1968 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | 62 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 229 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3390 mm |
