1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 1970 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1970 Mercury Comet is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1970 Mercury Comet. (98 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1970 Mercury Comet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 734 kg more than 1970 Mercury Comet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Cadillac 62 | 1970 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | 62 | Comet |
Year Released | 1957 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 4092 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2630 mm |