1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 1978 ZIL 4104
To start off, 1978 ZIL 4104 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,695 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 ZIL 4104 (311 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1957 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 1957 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 ZIL 4104 weights approximately 1332 kg more than 1957 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Cadillac 62 | 1978 ZIL 4104 | |
Make | Cadillac | ZIL |
Model | 62 | 4104 |
Year Released | 1957 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 7695 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 3336 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3340 mm |