1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1194 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1957 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1957 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1981 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1957 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Cadillac 62 | 1981 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 62 | Colt |
Year Released | 1957 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2310 mm |