1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 1990 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1990 Mercury Sable is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 604 kg more than 1990 Mercury Sable.
Because 1957 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Cadillac 62 | 1990 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | 62 | Sable |
Year Released | 1957 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 2511 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2700 mm |