1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (252 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 381 kg more than 1957 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Econoline |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 5407 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 2385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3510 mm |
