1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Chevrolet SSR
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1957 Cadillac 62. (267 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1957 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 146 kg more than 1957 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Chevrolet SSR | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | 62 | SSR |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 5324 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 300 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 2150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2950 mm |
