1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1957 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1957 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 484 kg more than 2002 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1957 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 2002 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1957 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | GT 40 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2620 mm |