1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac 62 (267 HP) has 197 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1264 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1957 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1957 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Cadillac 62 | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Cadillac | MCC |
Model | 62 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 1810 mm |