1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2003 Dodge Ram. (173 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 66 kg more than 1957 Cadillac 62.
Because 2003 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1957 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2003 Dodge Ram has manual transmission. 2003 Dodge Ram will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1957 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | 62 | Ram |
Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 3906 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 2070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2790 mm |