1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1004 kg more than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1957 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR has manual transmission. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1957 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | CLK GTR |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 4998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2680 mm |
