1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 366 kg more than 1957 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 2370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3510 mm |
