1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Swift is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Swift. (100 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 909 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Swift. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Suzuki Swift | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | 62 | Swift |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2390 mm |
