1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Impala. (200 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1957 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Impala |
Year Released | 1957 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2810 mm |