1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Kia Cee'd

To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Cee'd. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 646 kg more than 2009 Kia Cee'd. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1957 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1957 Cadillac 62 2009 Kia Cee'd
Make Cadillac Kia
Model 62 Cee'd
Year Released 1957 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5424 cc 1582 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 267 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2004 kg 1358 kg
Vehicle Length 5510 mm 4260 mm
Vehicle Width 2050 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1590 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 3290 mm 2660 mm