1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2009 Toyota Camry is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Camry (268 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1957 Cadillac 62. (267 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1957 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 930 kg more than 2009 Toyota Camry.
Because 1957 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Camry |
Year Released | 1957 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 3455 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 268 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1074 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2780 mm |