1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 BMW X6
To start off, 2010 BMW X6 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW X6 (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1957 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 1957 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X6 weights approximately 216 kg more than 1957 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 BMW X6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Cadillac 62 | 2010 BMW X6 | |
| Make | Cadillac | BMW |
| Model | 62 | X6 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 2220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4879 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1689 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2934 mm |
