1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2010 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1957 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1957 Cadillac 62.
Because 2010 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | 62 | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 4394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
