1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2010 Nissan NP300 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2010 Nissan NP300. (131 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan NP300.
Because 2010 Nissan NP300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan NP300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1957 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan NP300 has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan NP300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1957 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | NP300 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 2486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2960 mm |