1957 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Volvo S80
To start off, 2010 Volvo S80 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 245 kg more than 2010 Volvo S80.
Because 2010 Volvo S80 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | S80 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1759 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1864 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2776 mm |
