1957 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1954 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 5,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1954 Studebaker Commander. (140 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1954 Studebaker Commander.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Cadillac Eldorado | 1954 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Cadillac | Studebaker |
Model | Eldorado | Commander |
Year Released | 1957 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5973 cc | 3673 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.1 mm | 71.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3070 mm |