1957 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 1957 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1957 Cadillac Eldorado has automatic transmission and 1981 Zastava 102 has manual transmission. 1981 Zastava 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1957 Cadillac Eldorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Cadillac Eldorado | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | Eldorado | 102 |
Year Released | 1957 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 5973 cc | 1302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2160 mm |