1957 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2003 Ford F-250
To start off, 2003 Ford F-250 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2003 Ford F-250. (256 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford F-250.
Because 2003 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado (543 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford F-250. (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1957 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Cadillac Eldorado | 2003 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Eldorado | F-250 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5973 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 543 Nm | 474 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3490 mm |