1957 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2003 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1957 Cadillac Eldorado. (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1957 Cadillac Eldorado.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado (543 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Mustang. (529 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1957 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Mustang.

Compare all specifications:

1957 Cadillac Eldorado 2003 Ford Mustang
Make Cadillac Ford
Model Eldorado Mustang
Year Released 1957 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5973 cc 4600 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 325 HP 400 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 543 Nm 529 Nm
Torque RPM 3300 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 90.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92.1 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 8.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 5500 mm 4630 mm
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 3210 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 68 L