1957 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (123 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado (543 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 401 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1957 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Roadster. 1957 Cadillac Eldorado has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda Roadster has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda Roadster will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1957 Cadillac Eldorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Cadillac Eldorado | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Eldorado | Roadster |
Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5973 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 543 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.1 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 48 L |