1957 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2009 Hummer H3
To start off, 2009 Hummer H3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2009 Hummer H3. (239 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2009 Hummer H3.
Because 2009 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado (543 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Hummer H3. (327 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1957 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Hummer H3. 1957 Cadillac Eldorado has automatic transmission and 2009 Hummer H3 has manual transmission. 2009 Hummer H3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1957 Cadillac Eldorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Cadillac Eldorado | 2009 Hummer H3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Hummer |
| Model | Eldorado | H3 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5973 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 239 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 543 Nm | 327 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 95.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.1 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2170 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 87 L |
