1957 Chrysler Dart vs. 2002 Honda Accord
To start off, 2002 Honda Accord is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Chrysler Dart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Chrysler Dart would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Chrysler Dart is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1957 Chrysler Dart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Chrysler Dart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Chrysler Dart | 2002 Honda Accord | |
| Make | Chrysler | Honda |
| Model | Dart | Accord |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6400 cc | 2354 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
