1957 Citroen 2CV vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 599 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 MCC Crossblade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1957 Citroen 2CV. (12 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1957 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 245 kg more than 1957 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1957 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Citroen 2CV. (25 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Citroen 2CV.

Compare all specifications: