1957 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (128 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1957 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1957 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 381 kg more than 1957 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (315 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1957 DKW Munga | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | DKW | Chevrolet |
Model | Munga | Orlando |
Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 1284 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2760 mm |