1957 Fairthorpe Electron vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Fairthorpe Electron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Fairthorpe Electron would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Fairthorpe Electron (83 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Fairthorpe Electron should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1957 Fairthorpe Electron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Fairthorpe Electron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Fairthorpe Electron | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Fairthorpe | Ford |
| Model | Electron | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2090 mm | 2490 mm |
