1957 Ferrari 212 vs. 2011 Dodge Challenger

To start off, 2011 Dodge Challenger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ferrari 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ferrari 212 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Dodge Challenger (376 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1957 Ferrari 212. (163 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1957 Ferrari 212. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 1529 kg more than 1957 Ferrari 212. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

1957 Ferrari 212 2011 Dodge Challenger
Make Ferrari Dodge
Model 212 Challenger
Year Released 1957 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2562 cc 5700 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 163 HP 376 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5150 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 875 kg 2404 kg
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 5022 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2260 mm 2946 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 159 L 72 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]