1957 Fiat 1100 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Fiat 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Fiat 1100 would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1957 Fiat 1100. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1957 Fiat 1100.
Because 1957 Fiat 1100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Fiat 1100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Fiat 1100 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | 1100 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2490 mm |
