1957 Ford 12 M vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1965 Riley Kestrel is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Riley Kestrel (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Ford 12 M weights approximately 15 kg more than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Because 1957 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Ford 12 M | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Ford | Riley |
| Model | 12 M | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1350 mm |
