1957 Ford 12 M vs. 1968 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 1968 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar XJ6 (245 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar XJ6 weights approximately 785 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Ford 12 M | 1968 Jaguar XJ6 | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | 12 M | XJ6 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2780 mm |
