1957 Ford 12 M vs. 1980 Mini MK IV
To start off, 1980 Mini MK IV is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Ford 12 M (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1980 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1957 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 1980 Mini MK IV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Ford 12 M weights approximately 290 kg more than 1980 Mini MK IV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Ford 12 M | 1980 Mini MK IV | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | 12 M | MK IV |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2040 mm |
