1957 Ford 12 M vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Ford 12 M weights approximately 126 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 1957 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Ford 12 M | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | 12 M | 102 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2160 mm |
