1957 Ford 12 M vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 5,000 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM (664 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 611 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM weights approximately 515 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Ford 12 M | 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 12 M | CLK LM |
| Year Released | 1957 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 664 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2600 mm |
