1957 Ford 12 M vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 308 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Ford 12 M | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | 12 M | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1208 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2580 mm |
