1957 Ford 12 M vs. 2000 Honda FCX
To start off, 2000 Honda FCX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda FCX (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Ford 12 M weights approximately 60 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX.
Because 1957 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Honda FCX has automatic transmission and 1957 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1957 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda FCX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford 12 M | 2000 Honda FCX | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | 12 M | FCX |
Year Released | 1957 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2580 mm |