1957 Ford 12 M vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1957 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M.
Because 1957 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford 12 M | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | 12 M | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2490 mm |