1957 Ford 12 M vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,485 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (163 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 594 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford 12 M | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 12 M | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1957 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2485 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1494 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2630 mm |