1957 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Mazda 2
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 2 (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford 12 M | 2004 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | 2 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2500 mm |