1957 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 642 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford 12 M | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | 6 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2680 mm |