1957 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2300 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 543 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Ford 12 M | 2004 Mazda B2300 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | 12 M | B2300 |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1443 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3200 mm |
