1957 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (160 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S60 weights approximately 601 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford 12 M | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | 12 M | S60 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1501 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1430 mm |