1957 Ford 12 M vs. 2008 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2008 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 667 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1957 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1957 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Ford 12 M | 2008 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | 12 M | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1562 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2630 mm |
