1957 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Mustang weights approximately 708 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1957 Ford 12 M | 2010 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | 12 M | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1603 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4778 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1425 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2720 mm |
