1957 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 55 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 Ford 12 M | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1957 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3010 mm |